Drone bore question

A forum to discuss the arcane art of making uilleann pipes, reeds, and set maintenance.

Moderators: the plod, dropkick

Post Reply
tompipes
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Drone bore question

Post by tompipes » Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:08 pm

I've been looking at drone bore measurements lately and have noticed something with baritone drone bores.

I assumed that drone bore sections widen as they get longer and that's something I've found in the few sets that I measured and some measurements I've seen online and purchased.
But I've noticed in a few sets of measurements that the bore of some baritone drones are the same all the way along.
Notably the Hannon Coyne set. Both sections are 5.4mm in diameter. I've seen something similar in a Rowsome set too.
Is this a deliberate move by the maker or might there have been replacement parts added at a later time.

I've only made D and C half sets to date so I thought I'd ask the question before I moved to B sets.


Tommy

wooff
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 8:39 am
Real Name: geoffrey wooff

Re: Drone bore question

Post by wooff » Fri Jun 13, 2014 3:36 pm

That just has to be a mistake in measurement or, as you say a piece has been replaced.

I would suggest, for using cane drone reeds in a B set the first piece could be bored 3.6mm , or for using Elder (or something like that) then this bore could be 4mm. the second piece is ok at 5.4... both bores would have originally has some small amount of tapering.

tompipes
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Drone bore question

Post by tompipes » Fri Jun 13, 2014 8:08 pm

Thanks Geoff.
I thought something was odd about that number. 3.6 seems more like it.

I find very slight tapering can occur from constant re-insertion of D bits.
Personally I use an under size D bit for reaming and then a kind of spade bit to ream to the final size, after a year or 2, which also smooths out the bore so that'd remove any tapering from the first D bit. Mind you, I got some second hand gun drills which leave a very smooth bore when hand fed. Not cheap ($30 to $40 each), but fast. I don't use or intend to use a compressor.


Thanks again,

Tommy

User avatar
DMQuinn
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Finger Lakes

Re: Drone bore question

Post by DMQuinn » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:10 am

tompipes wrote:...
I got some second hand gun drills which leave a very smooth bore when hand fed. Not cheap ($30 to $40 each), but fast. I don't use or intend to use a compressor.
Can you tell us how you are using your gun drills without a compressor?

tompipes
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Drone bore question

Post by tompipes » Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:05 pm

David,
I'm just using them the same way I would use a regular D bit.
The dust collects on the clearing channel but it compacts so it has to be taken out of the work piece and cleared like a regular D bit.
The advantages are the you can ream further with each pass, all the swarf is collected so there's no chance of dust remaining in the bore to throw you off center and the bore is very smooth.
I recently bored timber for 5 sets of drones (no stocks just the actual drones)) and having 2 gun drill bits in the collection saved me at least an hour and a half, maybe 2 hours.
I have a small workshop set up in my basement so using a compressor is out of the question. I have a small but sufficient dust extraction set up but I doubt it would catch the dust that would be forced from a gun drill.

Tommy

User avatar
DMQuinn
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Finger Lakes

Re: Drone bore question

Post by DMQuinn » Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:36 am

Thanks, Tom
If it makes the hole, that's what counts.

fiddlerwill
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:12 pm
Real Name: Will Hornsby

Re: Drone bore question

Post by fiddlerwill » Sun Jun 15, 2014 12:51 pm

thats what I do as well.

billh
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:12 am
Location: skerries-by-the-sea
Contact:

Re: Drone bore question

Post by billh » Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:06 pm

That's a transcription error that was _supposed_ to have been fixed in the scans. I was fairly horrified when I saw that.

The first joint has a bore of just under 3.6 mm (as one might expect). It does not flare appreciably toward the end of the slide tenon, but it has a slight chamfer.

Definitely one for the errata sheet!

- Bill

tompipes
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Drone bore question

Post by tompipes » Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:21 pm

Bill,

I just had a look on pipers.ie and I checked my hard copy and they both read 3.55mm.

I had an old PDF with the old number so all is correct.

Sorry if I caused any panic.

Mind you, there is a document floating around online with Rowsome drones measurements.
Both the stand and slide are 4.8mm in the bore.
Again, it could be an error, a replacement part or a monday morning set...

All the best.

Tommy

fiddlerwill
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:12 pm
Real Name: Will Hornsby

Re: Drone bore question

Post by fiddlerwill » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:22 pm

it says 3.6 in mine which i noticed expecting 4.5 apprx . narrow!

tompipes
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Drone bore question

Post by tompipes » Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:50 pm

it says 3.6 in mine
In the Coyne B or Rowsome D?

Tommy

fiddlerwill
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:12 pm
Real Name: Will Hornsby

Re: Drone bore question

Post by fiddlerwill » Mon Jun 23, 2014 12:30 pm

Hannon Coyne B

tompipes
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:06 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Drone bore question

Post by tompipes » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:22 pm

Ah right.
It says 3.55mm now. Close enough!

I downloaded the PDF's when they were published first and there was a typo.

I've seen a Rowsome baritone drone stand bore in D that were 3.8. Quite narrow. Could have been an experiment.

Tommy

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest